Category: phone number list

ptimized for touch contA few days ago, Google released a new version of the popular Google Chrome browser, and in this short message we will see what is new compared to the previous version.

Chrome 21: a bit faster again?
Chrome has always been characterized by high speed, and the new desktop version is no different. At first glance, I had the impression that Chrome was slightly faster. It’s just my subjective opinion, but it seems that Google is still working on the speed of its browser, and the new version of Google Chrome 21 is faster than its predecessor.

Current version of Chrome browser

Security fixes are now a matter of course
Like every version, this one is also accompanied by security bug fixes. The riskiest bugs this time revolve around PDFs and new features. But there weren’t many big rewards from Google anymore. A total of two thousand dollars was divided between the two users, which is about 41,000 Czech crowns. AddressSanitizer found most of the errors this time. You can read more about the security issues on the official blog .

New features of Chrome 21

Chrome now includes a getUserMedia API. This should enable video and audio communication in the browser over the Internet without the use of a plugin (for example, Flash). So you can use the webcam to chat with whoever you want via Chrome without a single plugin. Chrome also includes sweden phone number data other interesting features, but one of the more prominent ones is the support for high screen resolutions . So even on the Retina displays of the new MacBook Pro, Chrome will look .

Disadvantages and risks associated how to create a new account at Hostinger with the use of web server services

Unsolicit upgra

With desktop applications, the user normally decides when and if at all to upgrade their software. It is often recommended to wait with by lists the upgrade until all serious flies (bugs) have been caught in the new version. Sometimes the user doesn’t like the new version, so he stays with the older one. With web applications, the user cannot avoid the upgrade and must willy.

It is often talk about how open web technologies are moving towards replacing proprietary technologies and freeing browsers from dependency on plug-ins.

Going in this direction and can they even reach the goal?

Plug-ins for web browsers exist for one simple reason: they are suppos to enrich the browser with functions and options that the browser itself does not have, but the user nes for certain actions. But plug-ins also come with problems. As a reaction to them, the creators of web browsers and web technologies, along with some operating web services, are trying to get rid of dependency on plug-ins. But how successful is it in reality?

Problems? Dependency, incompatibility, instability, dangerousness

The first problem is the plug-in dependency itself . That is, the fact that the user is not sufficient for select actions with the web browser alone, but has to bother with installing a plug-in, for which he may not have high enough privileges in the operating system, so he cannot do without the assistance of the computer administrator. This may seem like a minor issue compar to other issues.

The second and more serious problem is plug-in compatibility . They do not have to and usually do not even support all browsers, among which the user is free to choose. There may also be a problem with plug-in compatibility when the browser is updat, when the plug-in is not ready for the changes that the new version brings. Such a plug-in then does not work at all or behaves problematically. In the worst case, it transfers its problematic behavior to the entire browser.

The third problem is the negative effect of plug-ins on stability . Practically all the camps of browser creators say the same thing: plug-ins are most often, or at least very often, responsible for browser crashes. Therefore, some modern browsers separate them into a separate process so that the plug-in runs in isolation and in the event of its crash does not tear down the entire browser and the current session, which may not be able to be restor.

The fourth and certainly the most

fundamental issue is the security of plugins . Untreat security flaws in plug-ins can put users at risk even if they are using the latest version of the browser. In some thailand phone number data circumstances, visiting a malicious website or a compromis legitimate website is enough for the infection to successfully attack the operating system through a hole in the plug-in just by loading the website.

Of course, the issue of updating plug-ins is also connect with security errors. Even for the most critical ones, where a lot of work has local Advertising methods – h1ad articles already been done on the update mechanism, the optimal distribution of the latest version with all the patches among the users still fails. Then there are plug-ins that don’t support by lists auto-update at all. At the same time, years of practical experience show that transferring the responsibility for updating software to users is a road to hell from a security point of view.

Computer analysts predict that the Internet browser will become the operating system of tomorrow. They are based on realistic assumptions…

…or did they get carried away by the boom in web applications and the development of cloud technologies?

Account
Software as a Service. Who doesn’t know the wonderful vision when all applications will be available online as a service, and thus wherever there is an Internet connection, any software will be available from powerful data centers. The idea is great as long as one can enjoy a reliable and fast enough internet connection. While the availability and speed of the Internet is increasing, no provider can guarantee absolute reliability. It’s impossible to prevent a natural disaster, a technical glitch, or some shill with a big pickaxe kicking a bit further than he should have.

But back to the optimistic note. It is really nice to have access to your favorite programs anytime and from anywhere. By placing applications on a server, it is also possible to work together on one project, play a game together or share files, while individual participants can be scattered all over the planet. Users also don’t have to worry about maintaining their computers and applications. Data synchronization is a matter of course. However, companies will earn the most, because they will get rid of the expensive IT department and instead of providing their own services, they will simply order the necessary amount of services cheaply.

Even software companies would

Although they would have to change their business model and turn from suppliers to providers, many companies are already doing well this way, e.g. List or Google. The switzerland phone number data benefits that accrue to them are as follows:

applications cannot be copied from servers and distributed illegally → the company does not lose customers

feedback – user behavior can be monitored (what they click on, which functions they use the most.

Zothing prevents you from upgrading or patching apps instantly

So, in general, software companies would have more control over their own applications and a better overview of their users. Users the manager’s goal is to prepare the ground would understandably feel exactly the opposite. They would have no control over the applications and essentially no control over their data. This will surely become a serious obstacle in fulfilling the vision of software as a service. People will probably stay more or less loyal to the desktop apps they feel more confident with. And there is no doubt that there is by lists something to worry about! Many cases of data leaks, censorship, restrictions, harassment, etc. are already known, especially from various social networks. Publicly known cases are, however, only the tip of the iceberg; what has been hidden or escaped attention is certainly far more!

changes in appeMozilla Firefox 13 introduc silent updates (Chrome has had them since the beginning). The feature has its positive effects on security, but there are also its critics…

Silent updates are one of the ways to automatically update computer software, which is now increasingly gaining ground in the field of web browsers and some of their add-ons, l by the extend Flash Player plug-in from Adobe, due to considerable user and mia attention. The principle of silent updates is that the update is install without the ne for any interaction with the user.

The update is handl by a service or process running in the background. Everything will happen fully automatically, from detecting the availability of the update to downloading it to applying it. Updates are thus distribut and install practically immiately after their release (of course, it depends on how the distribution is distribut in order not to overload the source servers). It does not wait for the user’s consent to install them.

The user does not have to learn about the ongoing update process at all, and in the worst case, he will not even learn about the successful completion of the update installation or about the fixes and news it brought. And this is one of the things that bothers the critics, but first let’s talk about why the creators of various browsers came up with this system of distribution and installation of updates.

Silent updates come due to user laziness

Silent updates have both their supporters and critics, and as is often the case, the critics are somewhat louder and more visible. However, there is one strong argument for silent updates: security. Years of experience show that even the simplest and most self-indulgent user-dependent update mechanism is not effective enough in spreading security updates.

Technical innovations (automatic offering of updates or their automatic incremental installation) and at least two decades taiwan phone number data of ucation do not lead to the desir goal. Many users still ignore security updates, even though they are serv right under their noses. An unpatch web browser is a big security risk.

A successful system infiltration can happen

Just by loading a web page. At the same time, the user does not ne to navigate to sites that are generally consider risky. The latest observations show that, for example, the danger of porn sites has become just a widespread cliché. Symantec, for example, states that websites with religious themes are much more dangerous .

Attackers attack legitimate and hitherto fully trust websites and silently place code on them to spread the malware infection. They often use known security flaws in popular open source publishing systems that are us by millions of websites to run (such as WordPress and Drupal), or in popular add-ons and templates for them.

At the same time, infecting one computer is not a private problem of its owner or user. Infect computers are put together in so-call botnets, and their collective power is abus for a variety of nefarious purposes, from various forms of attacks on specific services and servers to the massive dissemination of unsolicit and fraudulent messages not only via e-mail, but nowadays increasingly also via social networks.

Spam emails

From a certain point of view, any infect computer with Internet access can be consider a problem for every Internet user and, of albert einstein later prov their existence course, companies offering or operating their services on it. Not to mention attacks of the nature of international or industrial espionage (see recently, for example, the Flame worm ). That is why security updates are given such importance and why (not only) web by lists browsers resort to the most efficient solutions for their distribution. Top among them are silent updates.arance and functionality.